Legalising Euthanasia

Socialist Alliance supports legalising euthanasia and we've advised Dying with Dignity Tasmania (Inc) of this so they've included us on their election website at

http://www.dwdtas.org.au/political/candidates_2010.php


Here is part of our response:

"I am the Socialist Alliance candidate for Franklin. I was given your letter to respond to regarding our position on the proposals outlined...

... I chose to respond to your letter because I currently work as a social worker in a public hospital. I therefore have seen first hand and heard from others the dreadful things that happen because people are not allowed to die with dignity.

I have also just finished the Respecting Patients Choices training about advance care planning. Some of the readings recommended as part of this training highlighted how often patients choices are not respected which is unacceptable and for more needs to be done to ensure that people's choices are honoured...

Socialist Alliance believes that people should have access to legalised
euthanasia with the rigorous protection measures that you outlined in your
letter. We supported the Dying with Dignity private members bill which
was brought forward by the Greens last year. Of course Socialist Alliance
was extremely disappointed that this bill was voted down.

Socialist Alliance will continue to look for opportunities to support any
campaigns to legalise euthanasia in Tasmania and Australia. This is
supported by the majority of the community as highlighted by a recent poll
commissioned poll by Enterprise Marketing and Research Services found 78%
of Tasmanians support euthanasia becoming legal.

We commend your organisation for the wonderful work you do in campaigning
for euthanasia and we will continue to support you and the campaign to
legalise euthanasia in any way that we can.

Kind regards

Jenny Forward
Socialist Alliance for Franklin and

(on behalf of)
Mel Barnes
Socialist Alliance candidate for Denison

Socialist Alliance Announces Forest Policy for 2010 State Election

The Socialist Alliance has given its full support to call to immediately to protect Tasmania's native forests, by adopting in full Climate Action Hobart’s Step 2 in its ten steps for a safe climate as its official Forest Policy for the 2010 election, which is as follows:

“The Tasmanian Government must act immediately to protect Tasmania's native forests as permanent and resilient carbon stores. This would include immediately ensuring that no new logging operations take place in intact natural forests in Tasmania, and commissioning a fully independent accounting methodology for carbon emissions and storage associated with current forestry operations in the State. Recognising that protecting forests in this way will require changes in employment patterns and new skills, a core element of this initiative is for the Tasmanian Government to work with the whole community to devise a genuine and community-owned transition strategy for the forestry industry, to preserve employment during and after a switch from large-scale logging native forests to existing plantations and other activities.”

Socialist Alliance Candidate for Denison, Mel Barnes stated “We think the step as outlined is best way to deal with what is described as the “forestry conflict”. If we are to achieve a safe climate, we need to ensure that no new logging of natural forest occurs, which will immediately reduce Tasmania’s carbon emissions. We know from previous studies that Tasmania’s forests are amongst the most carbon dense in the world, a fully independent study, however would give us the full picture of how much carbon is stored in our forests.”

Barnes continued, “We are proud to be a working class party, which supports working class Tasmanians, so recognizing that a just transition is necessary for timber workers and communities sustained by native forest logging, is incredibly important. We believe it is possible and necessary for workers to support a “genuine and community-owned transition strategy for the forestry industry” and we will seek to convince workers of this.”

The Socialist Alliance also calls on all other parties to adopt this step as their forest policy for the coming elections

Melanie Barnes 0423 978 518



Authorised by Susan Austin, 225 Murray St, Hobart, 7000.
9th of March 2010

PUBLICSERVICES@WORK Response

Here is the Socialist Alliance response to the Community & Public Sector Union's (CPSU SPSF Tas) campaign called PublicServices@Work which asked ALL candidates for their response regarding how they will support the Tasmanian Public Service. This was signed by Jenny Forward Socialist Alliance Candidate for Franklin and current delegate for the CPSU (SPSF TAS)and Melanie Barnes Socialist Alliance Candidate for Denison. For more info see it online at http://www.abettertasmania.com/


Dear Tom

Firstly we would like to congratulate the CPSU on organising the Better Tasmania campaign that highlights the important role of the public service as well as asking candidates to outline their commitment to your document Public Services @ Work: Tasmanian Public Sector Policy. Furthermore we would like to congratulate the CPSU on providing ALL candidates with an opportunity to respond to your proposed policy and not just the major parties.
I am happy to inform you that Socialist Alliance fully supports the principals outlined in the Public Services @ Work: Tasmanian Public Sector Policy. We believe in ensuring fairness, security, innovation and governance in Tasmania public services.
We have always supported the salary nexus that would provide workers with pay parity with workers in the rest of Australia. We therefore have supported unions including the CPSU and their members in the Tasmanian Public Service who have been courageously fighting for pay parity despite the State Labor Governments opposition to it over the years. We will continue to support unions and workers who oppose wage agreements that renege on keeping the salary nexus. We were also opposed to the Labor Governments' proposal to try to slash about 800 public service jobs due to the global financial crisis and we were opposed to their axing of the entire Department of Environment, Parks, Heritage and the Arts.
Community mental health services are also struggling as they are staffed well below the benchmark when it comes to both allied health and nursing mental health professionals. The Bartlett Government has released glossy papers on Mental Health Promotion and Early Intervention yet people with acute mental illness and complex co-morbidities sit on waitlists. Grassroots mental health clinical staff would like to extend their services to do early intervention and health promotion activities but because of the chronic understaffing, they end up having to spend all their time responding to those in crisis. Also the hospital psychiatric ward in the Royal Hobart Hospital absolutely needs at least one more social worker, psychologist and occupational therapist to be able to provide real multi-disciplinary treatment to the large numbers of patients.
Health workers play a crucial part in providing public services to Tasmanians yet a Mercury article dated January 29, 2010 stated that a national Report on Government Services reveals that "Tasmania had a lower rate of public hospital doctors and nurses than the Australian average". Socialist Alliance therefore supports an increase in the number of hospital doctors and nurses and this would have a positive impact on services and on the elective surgery waiting lists.

Socialist Alliance therefore believes that the Bartlett Labor Government is not committed to fairness and guaranteed services as they state in their comments regarding your public sector policy. We are also concerned with their apparent push to de-professionalise many areas of the public service which we consider to be a threat to the quality of services to meet the needs of the Tasmanian public.
Socialist Alliance would properly fund all health services to ensure that Tasmanians receive the quality care they deserve. However Socialist Alliance also believes that the public sector should be extended to cover all those economic sectors where public provision would be cheaper, more efficient or provide equality of access. Our belief is that energy and water utilities, postal and telecommunications services, financial institutions, airports and airlines, shipping, railways, the extraction and sale of natural resources, public housing, transport, prison facilities, aged care, child care and health care services should be publicly owned. We also believe that drug development and production should be entrusted to a state pharmaceutical firm; and there should a state superannuation fund, eliminating the risk of workers losing their savings.
For the past two decades both the Labor and the Liberal party have lied to us claiming privatisation would provide cheaper and better health and education along with more affordable and efficient transport, housing and communication and care for our children and elderly. This period has shown us that this is not the way privatisation works and instead and it has forced bills up, jobs down and created a larger division between the rich and poor.
Instead Socialist Alliance supports the rebuilding of our public sector, one that is very well funded and encompassing latest technologies with boards comprising workers, consumers and administrators to ensure accountable, transparent and democratic management. This would provide a system where the government would be directly accountable to the people and would deliver a system of quality, efficiency and duty of care.
Furthermore we propose an alternative to the privatisation of public assets and resources and call for the nationalisation of Gunns Ltd to put these resources in public hands and make the government accountable for their practices.
Another public asset that demonstrates the dangers of privatisation is the Tasmanian rail system. We want to avoid another disaster after it was sold off and then bought back in worse condition. We need to massively expand the rail workforce so that we can provide quality and publicly owned rail services in Tasmania. Unlike the Liberals, Socialist Alliance does not want to expand the Midlands Highway but instead we support the introduction of fast speed trains between Hobart and Launceston as these are a safer and more environmentally friendly alternative.

While we agree with the policy on consultation when any major changes are put on the table, we would argue that unions, as workers’ representatives, need to be involved from the start and major changes to the public sector would need union approval.
To conclude Socialist Alliance has a proud and long history of supporting worker’s rights and struggles both in Tasmania and at a National level and we will continue to do so. The Tasmanian Public Service needs more support to enable it to better meet the sometimes complex needs of the people of Tasmania.
Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you require any further clarification.

Kind regards


Jenny Forward
Socialist Alliance Candidate for Franklin
Current CPSU Delegate


Mel Barnes
Socialist Alliance Candidate for Denison

Emailed 26/2/10

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Policy

Socialist Alliance candidate for Franklin Jenny Forward was asked to meet the sexual & gender diverse community at the Kingborough/Huon Valley Coming Out Proud (COP) Community Liaison Committee election forum and to outline our GLBTI policy.

Here is the speech given by Jenny Forward who grew up in the Huon Valley in response to the questions provided by COP. The responses were mainly drawn from the recent national policy adopted at the 2010 Socialist Alliance Conference after extensive consultations with members of the GLBTI communities and Scarlet Alliance:


How will your Government provide access to the GLBTI Community to discuss its issues and develop appropriate policy and practice responses?

We believe in supporting independent social movements to pressure governments. Socialist Alliance believes that the best way for the GLBTI community to influence policy and practice is by being organised and active themselves. The Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group TGLRG led the successful 1988-1997 campaign for gay law reform in Tasmania and it is a wonderful example of what you can achieve and how you can influence political parties through your own activism. Tonight’s forum and ongoing activism and organising by representative groups such as the Tasmanian Council for Sexual & Gender Diverse People are a crucial means of influencing policy and practice.

It is worth noting here that the ALP has recently set up a Social Inclusion Unit within the Dept of Premier and Cabinet but it doesn’t go far enough regarding the GLBTI community as Rodney Croome from the (TGLRG) stated: “We are pleased the Strategy is the first in Australia to acknowledge the exclusion GLBTI people face, but frustrated there’s no pointers for how to tackle this exclusion.” The Tasmanian Council for Sexual and Gender Diverse People also lobbied for greater inclusion to the communities they represent in the Social Inclusion Unit too.

What does your Party see as the major issues faced by the LGBTI community in Tasmania.

We live in a society which attempts to dictate sexual preference and gender identity through promoting the gender stereotypes and homophobic attitudes which underpin the heterosexual nuclear family, and by promoting marriage and the nuclear family as the only legitimate model for relationships. Lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, trans people and intersex people suffer oppression because their lives are a challenge to the nuclear family which is an economic cornerstone of capitalism.

The Socialist Alliance opposes all attempts to shoehorn people into sexual and gender conformity. We believe it is a basic democratic right that a persons’ self-definition of sexual preference and gender identity should be recognised. Heterosexism exists at almost every level in this society, and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is entrenched in all of the key institutions of society - education, health, the law, the media, family, church and state.

The Socialist Alliance supports politically independent and self-organizing social movements that fight the oppression of women, lesbians and gay men, trans and intersex people, people with HIV and sex workers through mass action, public demonstrations, lobbying, voting and by building alliances with the broader working class, feminist, and anti-capitalist movements.

We oppose sexism, racism, ageism, and discrimination against people with disabilities within the lesbian and gay communities, as we do in the broader community.

Therefore we see that the major issues in Tasmania are:
• Discrimination- schools, workforce, public places and services such as aged care
• Safe Public Housing for LGBTI
• Recognition of same sex relationships
• Funding boost for organisations especially those focussed on youth (as many leave and some suicide)
• There needs to be more acknowledgment of the diversity within GLBTI communities
• Self-determination for the Tasmanian GLBTI community

How would your Government respond to these issues?

• Enact enforceable anti-discrimination legislation to protect lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, people living with HIV and trans and intersex people. We will remove existing exemptions from anti-discrimination legislation in relation to employment for private schools, religious organisations, the insurance industry, the tax system, superannuation etc. The Socialist Alliance will legislate for the right of trans and intersex people to be issued with passports, drivers licenses and other documents specifying the gender (or non-gender) of their choice.

• Legislate full social, legal, trade union and industrial recognition of same sex and gender variant relationships. This would include extending to same sex relationships equal status with heterosexual de factos in superannuation, immigration, taxation, family law, industrial relations and any other laws and regulations; ensure the right of gays, lesbians and gender variants to choose to marry if they so wish; provide independent incomes [Newstart, Pensions, etc] for all regardless of relationship status - this will end state-enforced economic dependency.

• Guarantee the right of gay men and lesbians to adopt or foster children and to access free, safe reproductive technology like IVF. End discrimination against gay men, lesbians, trans and intersex people in child custody cases.

• Legislate against use of non-violent homosexual “advance” as a defense of “provocation” in violent crime.

• Provide full state funding for gay, lesbian, bisexual, trans people and intersex youth programs including refuges and housing services, health services, coming out, self-esteem and suicide prevention programs;

• All public funding for education, youth, aged, health, employment and welfare to be directed though non-discriminatory government and/or secular non-profit community organisations. Education in schools to incorporate positive material on homosexuality, trans and intersex peoples.

• Support Pride Marches, the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras, film and video festivals and other queer community events; defend and extend gay, lesbian trans and intersex programming on the ABC, SBS and community broadcasters; work vigorously for an end to the vicious and destructive portrayal of gay men, lesbians and trans people people in some sections of the media.

• Mandatory sensitivity training and refresher courses for the police force in how to deal with LGBTI issues. This education and training must be developed with and by the LGBTI community. The selection of LGBTI liaison officers should be under the control of the LGBTI community and recallable.

• Support gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans and intersex workers; promote strong policies within unions to defend gay, lesbian, trans and intersex workers; support the establishment of gay and lesbian caucuses within trade unions.

Do you believe that GLBTI people are entitled to register and celebrate their relationships as for the Marriage Act?

Socialist Alliance has been active across Australia at a grassroots level on LGBTI issues. We have strong representatives and spokespersons on these issues such as NSW activist Rachel Evans who was the National Union of Students Queer Officer in 2006, she has also been active in Community Action Against Homophobia (CAAH), she also stood in Parramatta NSW Lower House in the federal election in 2007 and was the spokesperson for the NoToPope Coalition in 2008. And I would like to point out that Socialist Alliance has worked closely with the CAAH and has given regular spots to it to discuss issues in our paper the Green Left Weekly. WE have brought up not only these issues but have also highlighted issues facing queer refuges. And through our work in the CAAH we also initiated a petition calling for a repeal of the ban on same-sex marriage.

Socialist Alliance was a key force in Sydney to building mass pressure against discrimination through the passing of the same-sex marriage ban in 2004. When the ALP voted with the bill in the house of Reps, Socialist Alliance organised a snap occupation of the Marriage Registry including a “marriage ceremony” in which two of our members committed themselves to protesting for their right to marry.

Under the growing pressure specifically from the CAAH and the Alliance, the ALP backed away from passing the government’s legislation in the Senate, stating that “not enough community debate” had been had and bringing forward a senate enquiry; of course a week later the National Marriage Forum took place in Canberra, where the ALP announced their changed position to the Christian Right of stating their intention to end the Senate inquiry. I think that this really highlights the need for a mass left movement such as Socialist Alliance which is working on the ground with other organisations to create grass roots pressure on the major parties.

Socialist Alliance members in Hobart have also always played an active role in public campaigns promoting the rights of the LGBTI community and in favour of equal marriage rights.

We believe that marriage rights for GLBTI people are a key demand that must be met. There seems to be wide-spread support for de-facto rights which is also supported by the Labor party, but Socialist Alliance says that this is not enough. De-facto rights do not give comparable rights to those of married couples and to only promote de-facto and shy away from full marriage rights still continues ongoing discrimination.

Climate Change

Tasmanian Climate Change policy.

A response to Climate Action Hobart’s “Ten Steps for a Safe Climate Future”

Jan 2010

Two of the four key campaign priorities are:

· Tasmania to lead the way on climate change by protecting old growth forests, achieving 100% renewable energy by 2020 and stopping subsidies to big polluters

· Public transport – free and frequent local buses or light rail, fast-speed trains not more Midland highway lanes.

Socialist Alliance activists who participate in Climate Action Hobart were involved in the development of Climate Action Hobart’s 10 Steps for a Safe Climate Future. The Socialist Alliance broadly endorses the Ten Steps and regards it as a fantastic development for the state and for the movement against climate change. The Socialist Alliance makes campaigning against climate change a priority and launched our own national “Ten Point Climate Action Plan” as part of our first Climate Charter in 2007, which was updated in 2008 and is again under revision, in line with developments in science and the movement.

In regard to Tasmanian policy, the following document will clarify which Steps the Socialist Alliance has adopted in full, as well as those with which we have some minor disagreements. There are also some policies within the ten points that we agree with but have adopted more ambitious targets for. These have been adopted after extensive discussion and collaboration with environment groups (like Beyond Zero Emissions) and after being debated at national decision making conferences of the Socialist Alliance. In some cases we have adopted additional policies which address the objectives of the Steps, so we have also referenced them for your information.

Step 1:

Carbon neutral by 2050

We agree. Our latest national conference resolution includes:

The threat of runaway climate change caused by rising carbon emissions emanating from human industrial and agricultural activity is the greatest threat to the continued existence of human civilisation of our era. Increasingly alarming scientific predictions only further dramatise the urgent need for governments internationally to take immediate action to move to a zero-emissions economy and reduce greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere.

The Socialist Alliance calls for a just transition to a carbon-neutral economy.

60% by 2020 over 1990 levels

The following policy was adopted in 2007: Aim for 60% overall emissions reduction, including 95% power station emissions reduction by 2020 and 90% overall emissions reduction by 2030.

In the updated 2008 version of the Climate Charter these targets were strengthened by replacing that sentence with: Implement immediate emission reduction targets with the aim of reducing net emissions to zero as soon as practicable, with a goal of achieving 100% of power from renewable sources by 2020.

At our branch meeting 28/1/10 we clarified our position on targets – we agree with 60% by 2020 over 1990 levels and push for net zero carbon emissions by 2050 or as soon as possible.

Detailed, transparent plan with annual targets from 2010 on

We agree. Our climate charter says:

Introduce annual reduction targets of at least 5% to ensure that these targets are met.

We propose immediate economy-wide and sector-by-sector planning for all greenhouse gases, to meet these targets on time or before. We must establish mechanisms to review and change these targets as scientific forecasts are updated.

Businesses, local councils and government departments should all be required to commit to reducing their overall GHG emissions to zero as part of a national plan.

Step 2: No new logging of natural forests, independent carbon forest accounting, community-owned (government funded) transition strategy

We agree. Our climate charter says: Stop logging old-growth forests and begin an urgent program of re-forestation and protecting biodiversity to ensure a robust biosystem that can survive the stress of climate change and provide an increased carbon sink.

Our 2006 Tasmanian State election policy included:

- We call for the protection of the Weld, Blue Tier, Styx and Weilangta (Socialist Alliance supports the Greens “Forest Transition Strategy”)

- End logging in old-growth forests. End clear felling in all other native forests.

- Ban the export of woodchips from native forests.

- Replant forests in dry-land and other salt-affected regions

- Strict controls on land clearing

- No mining or mineral exploration in national parks and other areas of high conservation value

In addition Socialist Alliance Tasmania endorsed (at a meeting 28/1/2010) the wording of the CAH Step 2 (including specifying no logging of “intact natural forests” not just old growth forests and the policy on carbon accounting.)

Step 3: Reduce energy use – economy-wide energy savings plan, target of reducing total energy use by at least 20% by 2020 over 1990 levels.

Socialist Alliance Tasmania agreed on this policy point at a meeting on 28/1/2010 but would want a sentence included to ensure some of these initiatives do not disproportionately affect already disadvantaged people eg. when creating incentives through car registration charges, ensure health care card holder rebates continue. Ensure “cash for clunkers” programs are not linked to people having to purchase a replacement car.

In addition we adopted the following policy on energy reduction in our Climate Charter

One of the easiest ways to reduce GHGs is by increasing efficiency and reducing waste. More efficient appliances, insulating homes, better recycling, improved and more efficient public transport, producing locally-produced goods—these are some of the simple but effective changes that are possible right now.

But these changes will not happen fast enough if they’re left to the individual consumer's response to appeals to save energy, and to the “sticks and carrots” approach of energy price hikes and tax rebates.

To begin the transition to sustainability, we must set energy efficiency as a national goal, and then develop targets, standards, regulations and national and local campaigns to achieve it.

In Venezuela and Cuba the goal of eliminating incandescent light bulbs was achieved by having teams of volunteers installing free government-supplied, low-energy replacement bulbs. This is the sort of initiative that’s needed to make Australia’s 5.5 million homes energy efficient.

Governments committed to energy efficiency should have sustainable energy household conversion plans, with annual targets for solar power and heating installation compulsory for energy utilities These plans would build on and promote the various community initiatives dedicated to goals like creating “zero emission” housing, schools and other facilities.

They would require the same approach from business, with systematic energy audits and set compliance deadlines. Firms that don't upgrade to low emissions technology and processes would have to close or be taken over.

They would also monitor and establish strict standards for the energy use of business products. Businesses that operate in a market-based capitalist economy concentrate on selling products, and are unlikely to implement climate-friendly techniques unless strong regulations are introduced.

Integral to the plan would be the phasing out of the $9 billion in fossil fuel subsidies to energy-hungry industries like aluminium refining. Industries that are heavy users of energy would be required to obtain their energy needs from sustainable sources.

(Action Point 4). Require the fitting of all feasible energy efficiency measures to existing houses and subsidise owner-occupiers for the costs. Allow renters to use the same system. Install photovoltaic solar panels and solar hot water heaters on home roofs, subsidised or owned by the electricity authority. Give commercial buildings a deadline to meet six-star energy standards within two years, and 10-star standards within 10 years.

The Socialist Alliance national conference also adopted a detailed policy on coal and steel which explains the steps that need to be taken to reduce the energy used to make steel for industrial production.

Step 4: 100% renewable electricity by 2020, massive investment in wind and solar, no biomass from native forests, no new dam-storage hydro, net feed-in-tariff.

We endorse all of the parts of Step 4 as long as there is no increase in energy costs for low income households.

Our policy passed at the 2010 national conference, is as follows:

We support the campaign for an industrial scale renewable energy feed-in tariff (FIT) to encourage medium and large-scale renewable energy projects. We are against increasing energy bills for low-income households to pay for the FIT.

At the climate summit, a conscious decision was made to expand the demand to encompass all forms of power (including transport fuel) not just stationary electricity. Beyond Zero Emissions have put the case that this is achievable. SA supports this policy:

Our climate charter explains that: “Socialist Alliance has a goal of achieving 100% of power from renewable sources by 2020” and this was reaffirmed at the 2010 national conference: “The Socialist Alliance supports the campaign launched at the 2009 Climate Summit for the transformation of the economy to 100% renewable energy by 2020, as one essential component of the effort needed to prevent run-away climate change.”

Climate Charter 2008: 100% renewable energy by 2020

Australia could meet its basic energy needs from a combination of non-fossil fuel sources like solar, wind, biomass derived from agricultural wastes, tidal and geothermal (hot rocks beneath the Earth's surface).

Countries like Spain and Denmark already produce more than 20% of their energy from solar and wind power. Australia should set a target of having all of its electricity generated by renewable energy by 2020.

While massive government subsidies continue to be given to dirty fuels like brown coal, research into renewable energy technologies is not given adequate funds.

This lack of serious research and development funding for renewable energy means that the fossil fuel and nuclear industries can delay any change towards sustainability. It hampers the rapid development of renewable technologies with reduced unit costs that would enable them to compete with their cheaper polluting products.

The quickest way to guarantee that renewables are taken up at the speed needed to limit GHG increases is not to leave this job to the market and private industry - even “green” industry - but to create an adequately funded, publicly-owned renewable energy network.

The Socialist Alliance calls for the creation of a Sustainable Energy Authority to drive this effort, and the overall conversion to energy sustainability.

Climate charter 2008 action point 5. Bring all power industries under public ownership and democratic control. Begin phasing out coalmining and coal-fired power immediately. …Run the maximum possible base-load power from existing natural gas and/or hydro power stations instead of coal only as an interim measure until renewable energy is available. Coal to be used only for predicted energy peaks in the short term.

Climate charter 2008 action point 7. Accelerate the construction of wind farms in suitable areas. Boost research into all renewable energy sources. Build pilot solar-thermal and geothermal plants now. Create localised power grids.

Additional SA policy:

The Socialist Alliance acknowledges that a massive rollout of renewable energy, as proposed in our campaign work, will all occur on Aboriginal land. The Socialist Alliance will seek to build consciousness of Indigenous struggle within the climate movement, and highlight the fact that any major rollout of wind farms, solar thermal plants, etc, must occur under the direction of the traditional owners of the land upon which such plants are proposed to be built. (SA national conf 2010)

Step 5: Sustainable cities and regions: overhaul of planning schemes

Socialist Alliance Tasmania adopted this policy in full at a meeting 27/1/2010

Step 6: Investing in Public and Low Carbon Transport

We support all the aspects of the Step 6 except for some significant differences:

à We disagree that “bus fares must be set at a nominal level (not exceeding $1 for an adult fare)”. We have a policy for Free Public transport.

From Climate Charter 2008:

… We have to put public transport at the centre of our urban development plans.

Although trains are 40 times more energy efficient than cars, we won’t reduce or stop using cars and trucks unless there’s huge investment in public and rail freight transport to make it a real option for commuters and industry.

A successful public transport system will have reliable, frequent services available to everyone within 10 minutes walk of a service, especially in outer metropolitan regions. It will have to be a publicly owned, integrated system of heavy rail, light rail, ferry and bus services.

But we need to make it more attractive to users. To accelerate the switch to public transport it has to be free. That’s what transport authorities have always done when they really need to move large numbers of people quickly, as in the 2000 Sydney Olympics. It’s what has happened in the Belgian city of Hasselt: within a year of introducing free bus fares, patronage increased by 870%.

Most people think that this proposal would cost a vast amount of money. However, this reaction fails to measure the total (economic, social and environmental) cost and benefit of public transport against the total cost and benefit of continuing to shift people and goods by private car and truck.

On that scale, public transport wins hands down. For every 10% switch from car and truck and into public transport, the costs of air pollution, greenhouse gas emission, car accidents, traffic congestion, motor vehicle waste disposal, noise pollution and road maintenance would drop by at least $1.4 billion.

Free and frequent public transport combined with policies that stimulate cycling and walking is the only serious approach to curbing greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector.

Climate Charter 2008 Action Point 10. Make all urban and regional public transport free and upgrade services to enable all urban residents to use it for regular commuting. Nationalise and upgrade interstate train and ferry services to provide real alternatives to air travel. Prioritise rail freight. All rail, light rail and interstate freight to be electrified or to run on biofuels from waste where possible. Encourage bicycle use through more cycleways, and better facilities for cyclists. Implement free or very cheap bicycle rental networks.

We do not call for higher parking fees or financial incentives for workers or employers or preferential parking fees for electric vehicles, as these policies are not in line with our commitment to equitable solutions, they do not represent the structural solutions that will be the fundamental driver of behaviour change and they will have negative / unequal ramifications for poor or disadvantaged sectors of the community, including those who, for whatever reasons, cannot rely on public transport.

We also believe public transport needs to be more accessible for parents with dependent children and people with disabilities (Decision made by Socialist Alliance Tasmania at a meeting 28/1/2010)

A detailed interim policy on public transport was adopted at the SA National Conf 2010 and can be viewed at http://socialist-alliance.wikispaces.com/National+Conference+Decisions+on+Screen Page 46.

A state election media release on public transport “For the sake of people’s lives and the environment, invest in public transport” can be read at: http://socialistalliancehobart.blogspot.com/2010/01/for-sake-of-peoples-lives-and.html

Step 7: Just transitions: Sector-by-sector, company-by-company just transitions program to reduce emissions while preserving or enhancing employment

We support this policy point 100%. However we feel for a just transition to be implemented, different models of ownership and control other than the free-market model need to be utilised.

Additional policy under this point:

Public ownership:

That in its campaigning work, the Socialist Alliance continues to advocate fundamental social change as a necessary answer to the threat of climate change. This includes campaigning for our current policy positions, including the need for public ownership of key sectors of the economy. (SA national conference 2010 decision)

Co-operatives and social enterprises:

1. The Socialist Alliance supports community efforts such as the Hepburn Wind Co-operative in Victoria which aim to acquire/ build renewable energy generation capacity for the community.
2. The Socialist Alliance notes the “Eureka’s Future” project of the Earthworker Social Enterprise Association, currently an initiative of the Victorian District of the Mining Division of the CFMEU. This will see a social enterprise manufacturing solar hot water units for exchange, providing a range of options for workers to purchase, including through their EBA.

The Socialist Alliance supports the establishment of such enterprises as a social sector of the Australian economy, owned and controlled by working people. The Socialist Alliance will pro-actively support the existing project and future such projects by direct participation of Socialist Alliance members, and by promoting and defending this initiative in other areas of our work. We will particularly seek to integrate this example as an important part of our “green jobs” campaigning and literature in the union and environment movements. (SA national conference 2010 decision)

From the 2008 Climate Charter: No solution without public ownership and democratic control

The principle of “polluter pays” means that the polluting companies should be directed to clean up the mess they have made. Individual consumers do use polluting products but they are rarely responsible for the decisions that result in the pollution occurring: it is the big industries that must bear the costs.

The first measure to ensure a just solution is to take over industries that will not stop polluting, and place them under public ownership and scrutiny. In this way, those operations that are essential can be identified and kept (and cleaned up) while non-essential aspects can be scaled back or shut down. The profits that these public enterprises will still make can be re-invested in further programs.

Private power companies have a vested interest in making us all use more energy, whereas what is really needed is less use of energy and clean power targets that can be met with renewable sources.

But Australian governments have continually privatised public utilities, handing vital infrastructure over to the private sector. Public ownership and control over the vital area of energy generation and distribution is essential to bring this sector under an overall plan for greenhouse gas reduction and environmental sustainability.

Guarantee jobs, involve workers in the fight for a liveable environment

As old industries die, their workers are normally thrown on the scrap heap of unemployment. For example, as oil prices rise and cars become too expensive, the fossil-fuel based auto industry may well shrink to a boutique luxury service and masses of workers lose their jobs.

The same can be said for unsustainable agriculture, coal mining and similar industries. A plan for a transition to a sustainable and just economy is therefore essential. These workers would become the driving force and moral guarantor of the new sustainable society, and not left behind with the de-commissioned machinery.

Workers are critical to identifying and eliminating waste and pollution in the workplace, closing down old industries and opening new ones. The transition also needs government-funded “climate action brigades” - teams of people who can provide practical assistance and resources to assist households and communities improve their energy efficiency.

Also from 2008 Climate Charter: Provide guaranteed jobs and retraining on full pay for coal mining and power-station communities, with new sustainable industries being built in their areas and paid redundancies offered.

Step 8: Local and sustainable production and consumption

Socialist Alliance Tasmania adopted all the points in this step at its meeting on 28/1/2010 except for the broad statement: “Financial support for local small businesses engaged in local production”. Instead we would emphasise the need to support local co-operatives and publicly / community / worker owned sustainable enterprises.

Read our interim policy on agriculture adopted at the 2010 National conference at http://socialist-alliance.wikispaces.com/National+Conference+Decisions+on+Screen Page 56 and our climate charter policy on agriculture at

http://socialist-alliance.wikispaces.com/National+Conference+Decisions+on+Screen

Step 9: Closing resource loops and eliminating waste:

We fully agree with this policy and included similar wording in our 2008 Climate Charter:

All products require energy to be manufactured. Waste of energy and resources are built into the entire economy. More profits are made from designing products not to last, and pollution produced along the way goes on to become someone else’s problem. Even traditional recycling largely ignores manufacturing waste and assumes relatively few products can be re-used or recycled at the end of their lives. Most consumer products—with all the energy and raw materials that have gone into their production—one way or another become landfill.

In a zero waste economy, products are designed so that they can be repaired, re-used and disassembled for recycling. We must start to require manufacturers to take back their used products (cars, TVs, computers, etc.) and re-use the components.

(Action point 3): Start the transition to a zero-waste economy. End industrial energy waste by legislation. Improve or ban wasteful consumer products. Engage workers in industry, with the appropriate technical experts, to redesign products and jobs sustainably.

From the SA national conference 2010 policy on steel and coal:

Steel producers should be compelled to increase the recycling of steel which is much cleaner than blast-furnace steel (only 65% of available scrap metal is recycled in Australia each year). Steel producers should have to maximise the end of life recyclability of products, and governments should encourage scrap availability programs, especially in the electrical and domestic industries where recycling is minimal.

Obsolescence policy adopted SA national conf 2010:

In a world where resources are being rapidly devoured, inbuilt obsolescence is a crime and a useless waste not only of resources, but of time, energy and human life. Why should people waste their lives slaving away at dreary jobs to produce these goods for wages, which go on replacing obsolescent goods? If goods are made to last as long as possible, there can be massive gains in saving resources and reducing pollution. Redirected human employment, effort and saved time could be used in the massive battles to save the environment, produce more renewable fuel and food and improve health treatment and prevention.

Companies should be compelled to design products so that they can be repaired, recycled, re-used and disassembled for recycling. Manufacturers should be compelled to take back their used products (cars, TVs, computers, etc) and re-use the components.

Products should be designed in such a way as to minimize inefficiencies and waste both in their production and manufacture, and during and after their service life.

Step 10: Climate Justice and education

Socialist Alliance Tasmania endorsed all parts of Step 10 at a meeting 28/1/2010. We also stand for the expansion of free public education to train up workers to deal with climate change.

Similar climate justice wording in existing policy (Climate Charter 2008) is as follows:

The rich industrial countries are mostly responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, and they must lead the campaign for strong and rapid international climate action. Per head, Australia is one of the highest GHG emitters in the world.

It is impoverished developing countries like Bangladesh and Kiribati that will be most affected by climate change. Many poor nations will struggle to deal with the symptoms of climate change without massive technical assistance. The rich nations must assist poor nations to develop economic plans that avoid high-pollution industries and encourage the use of renewable energy.

This assistance is just part of repaying our ecological debt.

Additional policy that fits under this point includes:

Socialist Alliance proposes a massive program of converting energy infrastructure that will demand a large number of workers, requiring extensive redeployment and training. We will also need an expansion of free public education to provide sufficient numbers of skilled professionals to achieve the necessary research and development goals. (Climate Charter 2008)

Institute a program for accepting climate refugees, especially from countries in the Asia Pacific region, and that this program not result in any reduction in the number of humanitarian refugees. (Refugee policy adopted SA national conference 2010)

That the Socialist Alliance recognises the disproportional negative impact of climate change on Third World countries, which has already led to mass displacement and the deaths of thousands of people. The Socialist Alliance will promote practical solidarity between the Australian climate change movement and climate activists from other countries, especially from the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, The Socialist Alliance will advocate that the climate movement publicly oppose the Australian government’s threat to withdraw aid from Pacific nations such as Tuvalu, which is campaigning internationally for stronger targets. (Building the climate action movement policy SA national conference 2010)

Authorised by Susan Austin, 225 Murray St, Hobart, 7000.

---