|
March 27, 2011
July 27, 2010
Defending Tassie forests
Saturday, July 17, 2010
By Melanie Barnes
The crisis in the forest industry has provided an opening to end the decades-long fight about how forests are used in Tasmania.
I’m a climate change activist and have lived in Hobart for five years. During that time, I’ve been involved in the campaign against the Gunns’ pulp mill, through the group Students Against the Pulp mill. More recently I’ve been a member of Climate Action Hobart.
I’m running as a candidate for the Socialist Alliance for the seat of Denison in the August 21 federal election.
The “forest issue” is often what people think of when Tasmanian politics is mentioned, and for good reason. Who can forget the images of then Coalition prime minister John Howard being cheered by 2000 logging workers in the 2004 election after he announced old-growth logging would continue indefinitely?
The then Labor leader Mark Latham said: “No policy issue or set of relationships better demonstrates the ethical decline and political corruption of the Australian Labor movement than Tasmanian forestry.”
He was referring to the Labor Party in Tasmania and the forestry sector of the Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union, which had completely aligned themselves with the unsustainable forestry industry — and in particular with the main destroyer of Tasmanian forests, Gunns Limited.
What is often not told is what happened to those workers cheering Howard. With the onset of the global economic crisis and the demand for woodchips plummeting, many lost their jobs. Gunns was more than happy to use workers to defend profits, but ruthlessly shed those same workers when it suited.
The forestry industry is now in deep financial trouble. There is talk from the government about “reforming” or “restructuring” the industry. In May, the state Labor government gave a $3.6 million “assistance package” to forest contractors to continue business as usual.
These corporate bailouts do nothing to restructure the industry for the long term, or to help workers to leave the industry and retrain to find sustainable jobs.
The crisis in the forest industry has provided an opening to end the decades-long fight about how forests are used in Tasmania.
Community pressure led to the government calling talks between environmentalists and the industry, but these talks have been going on between closed doors, without community input.
There is a fear that negotiations could include trading government support for a plantation-based pulp mill in return for an end to logging in high conservation value forests.
The conservation groups chosen to take part in these talks cannot make decisions for the rest of Tasmanians; negotiation should be public, so that everyone can be part of decisions about the future of the forest industry.
Protection of forests in Tasmania is a national issue because forests are needed to reverse the damage of climate change. A study by the Australian National University into the carbon storage of Australian forests found that eucalypt forests of Victoria and Tasmania could contain more than 1200 tonnes of carbon per hectare.
A sustainable forestry industry would have to include:
• an end to logging in high conservation value forests, which destroys ecosystems and carbon banks needed to deal with climate change;
• a ban on wood-fired power stations that use wood from native forests;
• no pulp mill, not even one using plantation trees; and
• a sustainable plantation industry that doesn’t use chemical spraying or monoculture.
Forests are natural resources that should be used in the public interest. Tasmania’s forests should be put under the democratic control of all Tasmanians. When it comes to our environment, the interests of people and the planet should be put ahead of profit.
December 18, 2009
2010 Tasmanian State Elections

Resource public services, not Gunns!
For a healthy, socially just, sustainable and democratic state
MEDIA RELEASE
28 November 2009
Socialist Alliance pre-selected two candidates for the March 2010 Tasmanian State Elections at a meeting in Hobart last week. Young climate activist Melanie Barnes will run in Denison and experienced human rights activist and social worker Jenny Forward will run in Franklin.
Both will be campaigning on a strong platform of environmental and social justice reform, including for:
· A big funding boost for public health, education, and housing
· Tasmania to lead the way on climate change by protecting old growth forests, achieving 100% renewable energy by 2020 and stopping subsidies to big polluters
· Scrapping water and sewerage charges, returning it to local control with state government back-up
· Public transport – free and frequent local buses or light rail, fast-speed trains not more Midland highway lanes.
Both activists are passionate about transforming Tasmania into a more democratic and sustainable state that can ensure jobs a good quality of life for ordinary people and lead the way on preventing climate change.
Melanie Barnes is a 26 year old climate change activist who works for an environmental NGO. She has a Bachelor of Arts majoring in Indonesian and political science from the University of Queensland. She has been a leader of Students Against the Pulp Mill protests, Walk Against Warming actions, as well as anti-war, refugee, education and women’s rights campaigns. She is the Hobart organizer of the socialist youth group Resistance. She has also studied in Indonesia and represented Tasmania in an educational solidarity tour of Venezuela.Barnes said: “I am running in these elections because I take these issues seriously and want to inspire people to believe that there is an alternative and change can happen. Tasmania has so much potential to be able to deliver the things people really need and care about – a healthy environment, fulfilling jobs, community democracy and good healthcare and housing. But we need politicians who will put these issues ahead of big business concerns.”
Melanie Barnes, Socialist Alliance candidate for Denison Ph 0423 978 518
Jenny Forward has been a long term activist over the past 25 years both here in Tasmania and in Chile, in many areas including women's and human rights. She has also been active in the National Council of Single Mothers and Their Children as she is also a single parent herself of a daughter who is now 17. Jenny and her daughter have been living in Kingston for 3 years now after having lived in Taroona for 9 years. Her family are long time residents of the Huon Valley where they have worked as saw millers, truck drivers and farmers and her mother has worked as a teacher. Jenny became a social worker as a mature age student in 2001. She worked as a child protection worker for 5 years and for the past 2 years she has been working with migrants and refugees.Jenny Forward, Socialist Alliance candidate for Franklin Ph 0400 701 902
Authorised by Susan Austin, 225 Murray St, Hobart, 7000.
December 16, 2009
Making a Positive Contribution Towards Change in 2009
February 29, 2008
Big TAP Protest Outside Gunns, Petition, Meeting Reminder.
in Tasmania. We have a high-profile guest speaker and media coverage.
tapcontact@gmail.com
February 28, 2008
PETITION TO PROTECT COMMUNITIES FROM PULP MILL HAZARDS
To the Honourable the President and Members of the Senate in Parliament assembled:
The Petition of the undersigned Citizens of Australia declares that, in relation to the Tamar pulp mill assessment; the risks and costs of the proposal to agriculture, tourism and recreation; the total subsidies that will be required; and the investments, health and safety of the citizens in the region; all were ignored in the truncated process. Your petitioners were effectively unrepresented by their elected ‘representatives’.
Your petitioners want a return to; the protection of transparent due process; public & industry participation and protection in planning and; equal treatment for all; and therefore request that the Senate act to delay any pulp mill until a complete and independent study of the risks and costs to other industries and communities has been conducted including the likely total costs of all subsidies and cost relief (to Australian risk assessment or federal Treasury standards); the results made public and properly debated.
November 17, 2007
Media Release: SA candidates release open letter to timber workers
Socialist Alliance election candidates release open letter to timber workers
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
16th November 2007
Socialist Alliance candidates for Franklin and Denison have released an open letter to timber workers explaining why Socialist Alliance supports workers but is opposed to the Tamar Valley pulp mill.
In launching the open letter, Susan Austin, Socialist Alliance Candidate for Denison in the upcoming Federal elections, said “We’re not against all pulp mills, but we are against this one. It would poison the environment, endanger other industries in the region, and put other workers’ livelihoods at risk. More jobs would be lost in industries adversely affected by the pulp mill than would be created.”
“Gunns has no ongoing commitment to timber workers. We already see this when log truck drivers have their contracts ditched, leaving them with huge debts to pay for the trucks that they are in the middle of buying,” said Matthew Holloway, Socialist Alliance candidate for Franklin. “In addition, we know that Gunns doesn’t care about environmental impacts, but working people must. We workers would have to live with the environmental and economic consequences of a bad development like the pulp mill,” Holloway said.
Both candidates will be attending tomorrow’s anti-pulp mill march organised by The Wilderness Society. “We have been helping to promote this rally because it is important that the large majority of people in Tasmania and throughout Australia voice their opinions publicly. We expect the incoming government will eventually have to listen to the people, because the people are not giving up!” said Austin.
Susan Austin Ph: 0418 643 133
Matthew Holloway Ph: 0419 582 372
November 01, 2007
Student Protest Against the Pulp Mill Hobart 1/11/07
STUDENTS OUTRAGED BY GUNNS PULP MILL
October 27, 2007
Socialist Alliance candidates support student walk-out
MEDIA RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
25th October 2007
Socialist Alliance federal election candidates Susan Austin and Matthew Holloway are urging students to walk out of school on Thursday, November 1, to join the protest being organised by Students Against the Pulp Mill.
Hundreds of students are expected to walk out of school and rally on Parliament Lawns at 12:30pm to show their opposition to the pulp mill.
Young people have strong opinions on this issue as they will inherit the environmental issues caused by the mill if it goes ahead”, said Ms Austin, candidate for Denison. “We support the right of young people to express their opinion in public, and if they need to walk out of school to get their point across, then we support that”, Ms Austin said.
Matthew Holloway, Socialist Alliance candidate for Franklin, said “Socialist Alliance supports lowering the voting age to 16 because we believe if people are old enough to pay taxes, they are old enough to have a say. Walking out of school and protesting against the pulp mill is a legitimate way for young people to get their voices heard”, he said.
“We recognise that the type of pulp mill and the location being proposed, will lead to massive amounts of air, water and odour pollution, the continued deforestation of our beautiful state and the release of thousands of tonnes of carbon dioxide” Ms Austin said. “It will also lead to a loss of jobs in other industries, such as tourism, wineries and the fishing industries. With both major parties showing they are willing to over-ride due process to ensure the mill goes ahead, we support a variety of protest actions which express the democratic will of the majority, who are opposed to this mill”, Ms Austin said.
Susan Austin Ph: 0418 643 133
Matthew Holloway Ph: 0419 582 372
August 08, 2007
Tassie's forests 'Too precious to pulp'
Susan Austin, Hobart4 August 2007
Hundreds of people packed out the State Cinema in Hobart to watch the premiere of The Wilderness Society’s (TWS) pulp mill film Tasmania’s Clean Green Future: Too Precious to Pulp. The short film was made by award-winning film-maker Heidi Douglas, who is one of the “Gunns 20’’ defendants being sued by Gunns for previous films. It aims to counter the Tasmanian government’s latest propaganda campaign supporting the proposed pulp mill in the Tamar Valley, which consists of television and newspaper ads and large glossy brochures.
The $300,000, six-week advertising campaign, launched by the premier on July 8, has been criticised as “misleading” and “distorted spin” by academics and scientists. The July 15 Sunday Tasmanian reported that the mill process, including the cost of running the mill task force, the Resource Planning and Development Commission (RPDC) before Gunns pulled out of the process, the latest report by Finnish pulp mill consultant Sweco Pic and advertising had so far cost taxpayers more than $9 million. The reports commissioned by the state government were released on July 5, although not before the government received more criticism for showing them to Gunns first. A
fter throwing out the RPDC’s assessment process, the state government engaged Sweco Pic to conduct an environmental assessment and ITS Global to conduct a review of the social and economic benefits of the proposed pulp mill. Sweco Pic has worked with the companies contracted to design the mill, and ITS Global has been criticised by TWS and the Australian Conservation Foundation for helping Malaysian multinational Rimbunan Hijau run a public relations campaign last year to justify the company’s controversial logging operations in Papua New Guinea.
The reports found that the mill does not meet all environmental standards, will damage local tourism and may increase the road toll due to extra log truck traffic. However they recommend that the mill goes ahead, claiming that it will increase the annual gross state product by 2.5%, will create 1600 more jobs and that it met 92 of the 100 environmental guidelines.
Labor Premier Paul Lennon said that the state government would write the recommendations relating to the eight “failed” standards into the mill’s permits, which the government will regulate when the mill is operating.
The Tourism Industry Council released the results of a survey of the state’s tourism operators on August 2. Of those surveyed, the majority expected the mill to have a positive impact on the economy. However 58% of operators thought the proposed mill would have a negative affect on the Tasmanian brand and 34% thought the mill would have a negative effect on their business. The council called on the state government to establish an independent Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to monitor any pollution from the proposed mill.
In the lead-up to the 2006 state election the Labor Party committed to the establishment of an EPA in Tasmania. Tourism and environment minister Paula Wriedt said legislation for an independent EPA would be introduced in the spring session of parliament.
The Tourism Industry Council also called for major investment into rail services to remove log trucks from tourist routes. The Royal Automobile Club of Tasmania is also calling for more rail services should the mill proceed, saying that the mill could lead to a doubling of the number of log trucks on the highways.
Opposition to the mill has also led to a wine boycott. A July 24 article in the Melbourne Age reported that almost a dozen Melbourne restaurant-based sommeliers, consultants and at least one retailer are boycotting Gunns-owned wines, widening the circle of a boycott that began in Tasmania three years ago. According to the Age article, Gunns controls a sixth of the state’s wine production, including the brands Tamar Ridge, Coombend, Rosevears Estate and Notley George. The Victorian chapter of the Australian Sommeliers Association has sent out letters to its 350 members informing them about the Gunns pulp mill and the impacts it may have on the environment and the overall wine industry in Tasmania. Association president Ben Edwards was quoted as saying “Gunns have got a lot of money and a lot of power and we don’t. But we have influence.”
Hobart Mercury wine writer Graeme Phillips wrote in the August 1 edition that some restaurants around Tasmania have removed Gunns’ wines from their lists altogether, while a leading retailer reported that a growing customer awareness of the Gunns-Tamar Ridge connection has led to a slowing of sales, particularly in the last six months. Investors for the Future of Tasmania argue in one of their full-page anti-pulp mill ads in the Mercury that 180,000 tourists visit northern Tasmanian every year, the main attraction being the largest concentration of vineyards and cellar doors in the state. “All of these vineyards are ’at risk’ from odour emissions from this mill”, they claim.
TWS is calling on all members of parliament to honour a pre-election pledge not to vote for the pulp mill unless it met all environmental guidelines. It claims that the Sweco Pic report is unequivocal in its finding that the pulp mill fails to meet the guidelines referred to in the pledge. Haydn Walters, president of the Australian Medical Association in Tasmania, said the Sweco Pic report did not change the AMA’s view that the mill would add to the potential of health-damaging matter entering the Tamar Valley.
Gunns continues to use a variety of methods to influence state politicians, who are widely expected to vote to approve the mill in late August, including a “familiarisation day” at the site on June 29, where upper house MPs were given a site tour, a helicopter trip along the Tamar River to the Bass Strait and lunch at Gunns’ head office. Five independent legislative councillors and two lower house Liberal MPs have also been funded by the Lennon government (at a cost of about $10,000 each) to go on an all-expenses paid trip to South America and Europe to inspect pulp mills there. A Gunns lobbyist is accompanying the politicians on the tour.
On July 19 it was revealed that Labor backbencher Lisa Singh had written to the premier asking for a conscience vote on the mill, “in order to build confidence in the process”. The parliamentary Labor Party stated that it would not allow a conscience vote, and it expelled Labor MP Terry Martin when he crossed the floor and voted against the undemocratic pulp mill approval process in March this year.
Hobart City councillor Jeff Briscoe is planning to move a motion in the council to hold an electors’ poll on the issue during the October council elections, saying that “so far every Tasmanian has been denied a democratic vote over this important issue” and that “this is a fair way for everyone to express their view”. When the West Tamar Council held an electors’ poll on the pulp mill in 2005 (before the government chose to bypass the RPDC process), 56% of voters declared their opposition.
From: Australian News, Green Left Weekly issue #720 8 August 2007.
